Tag Archives: discipleship

Local Shopping, Personal Service, the Power of Connection, and the Art of Discipleship

Broken Vent Hood Light CoverA few weeks ago, in a need to do something that I could start and finish, I cleaned the stove. When I took off the light cover from the stove vent hood so I could wash it, it promptly broke.

“No problem,” I thought.  ”I’ll just get another one.”

Placing the broken on in the car, I decided that the next time I was near one of the large, big-box, home improvements stores, I would get a replacement.

A few days later, I the opportunity, so brought it with me and began to look for assistance.  After a long wait to flag down an apron-clad person whose job is to help people like me find what we need, I heard the news, “Well, we don’t actually carry those.  However, I’ll give you the number of the parts person and you can get in touch and find what you need.”

After returning home, I discovered I could get the info off the website.  A neck-twisting moment of getting the model and serial number later, I confidently typed in the information.  A few seconds later, a photo of exactly what I needed popped on the screen.  Success!  Except . . . they didn’t have any.  They suggested doing a web search for the product.

Not deterred, I did exactly that.  Quickly, the cover I needed popped up.  I headed to the website and . . . they didn’t have any.  A little longer search and I learned that the stove manufacturer no longer made this cover.

I searched a little while longer and, eureka!  I found it!  Yes, one obscure parts store had one.  And they were charging $54 for it.  Yep, $54 for a cheap piece of plastic.

I rebelled.  Just not going to do this.  The last and final suggestion after more web searching:  go to some local appliance dealership (NOT a big box store) and see if by chance they had one in their parts inventory.

Last week, I did just that.  Went to McNeill’s Appliances in Denton.  Within seconds, I was greeted and introduced to their parts expert.  I explained the situation, and showed her the cover.  About 1/2 second later, she said, “You are right–they are no longer manufacturing that part–but another manufacturer is and I think I’ve got one here.”new-cover

Three minutes later, my purchase completed (for about $7.00), and warm Christmas greetings exchanged, I walked out knowing that when I do need to buy another large household appliance, I will go there to do so, even though I might pay more for it.

The Connection with the Consumer-Driven Church

Recently, I wrote a series of posts about my concern over the Consumer-Driven Church model.  The question I am asking, “Can a consumer-driven church actually create disciples of Jesus Christ?”  Now, I’m defining a consumer-driven church as one in which all stops are pulled out to keep the extremely fickle “consumer” i.e., potential church-goer, happy.  I’ve received some very good and thoughtful replies to that post and have been thinking about it some more and wish to clarify my thoughts:

First, should we do every single thing possible to give people an excellent church experience?  Yes, I think so.  Facilities need to be clean, directional signs abundant, and barriers low.  Welcome should be both fully warm and extremely sensitive to different needs as people enter.

Second, should we utilize technology in order to ensure that the Gospel is heard in the ways people are experience the rest of their lives?  Yes.  I even wrote my D-Min project on the use of multi-media in worship.  I learned, though my project, that the good use of multi-media made the message far more memorable and understandable to anyone who has been raised in the world of receiving information visually.  Most auditory-only messages quickly go out of the brain.  A well-prepared message with multiple sensory and visual enhancements has a much better chance of longer impact.

What’s The Problem?

So what’s the problem?  Let’s assume for a moment that there are some parallels between the mega-church model and the big box store and the smaller church and the local, family owned business.  The level of personal connection changes radically from one to the other, but so does the cost-effectiveness of the operation.

I don’t think it is possible to mass-produce disciples.  I do think it is more cost effective, however, to mass produce church members/attenders.  From what I have both experienced and seen elsewhere, the art of discipleship is honed by deep, one-on-one interaction.

There’s nothing new to this idea.  Jesus had hundreds, even thousands of followers, twelve whom he formally named as followers, and only three who were apparently given greater, intimate knowledge of their Teacher.

I am guessing we need a means to gather together the hundreds and the thousands, and the consumer-driven church model may indeed be the best way to do that.  But we’ve also got to enhance the relationships between just the one and the few.

And here’s where I get stuck.  I am aware that, as pastor to a medium-membership church (just barely over the line from a small membership church), I can effectively disciple only a few.  Technically, if I want to really grow my church, I don’t spend a lot of time on those intense, often complicated relationships.  I’m out doing visionary things, painting big pictures for my leaders, making multiple contacts in the local community, honing messages and organizing the kind of worship that leaves people saying, “Wow!”

I’m also enabling an effective PR machine, am adept at all social media outlets and spend much of my life composing 140 character “tweets” that will have people panting for more.

And yes, I know the drill:  disciple those who will disciple others who will disciple yet more.  I’m also aware that the further those groups grow from the source, the more likely there will be a lack of overall cohesion.

Many fast-growing religious groups have grown on that small group model because it is a tightly controlled one.  People are taught exactly what to teach others, and standardized material is used across the board.  That’s the big-box church style:  standardize as much as possible because it enhances efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

Doing tailor-made, individualized discipleship takes massive amounts of time and energy. And its costs more.

I think we need both.  I know I am who I am today both because of the standardized, mass-produced model (I was a part of Campus Crusade for Christ when it was doing its most rapid growth and expansion) and the powerfully individual time I received from many who were willing to invest in me, especially as I entered into a time about 25 years ago where I had to completely re-think my theological constructs.

We’re going to have to address the issue of cost-effectiveness if we are going to live out our mission of making disciples.  The more we buy into the big-box model, the more successful we may become on one level of measurement.  I just continue to fear we will lose our soul and our real purpose in the long run.

Leave a Comment

Filed under church, discipleship, metrics, spiritual journey

Three Beat Up People, The Art of Discipleship, and Questions About the Pastoral Role

The Setting

On Sunday evenings, I’ve been holding a remarkably well-functioning Confirmation class consisting of several young teens, one older teen, and four adults, ranging in age from early 30′s to mid-70′s, a mixture of men and women.

The teens get drilled first. This is a “no-frills” confirmation regime: the faster they learn the material in a thoughtful, integrated way, the faster they can join the youth group which is also taking place. Once I am satisfied they’ve accomplished the learning goals for the evening, they are dismissed and we adults go into a more leisurely time of free flowing discussion that centers on the question of sanctification.

We’ve been reading CS Lewis’ The Great Divorce to give us a common jumping off place for our discussion.This past Sunday, for a variety of reasons, I just had two of the adults in class. I was extremely tired–an almost three hour finance meeting after three powerful and emotionally draining All Saints worship services had left me with no refresh time at all. I was also hungry, having eaten barely anything for lunch and breakfast by then 11 hours away.

We talked about just going home, but I decided to see if any important questions were lingering first.

To Be Real Christians

Today, I have no idea what the question was that ended up sparking a powerful time for the three of us. But we landed on the same question that had driven so much of John Wesley’s thinking, “How can we be real Christians?”

How can we indeed become so fully sanctified that all of our lives come under the Lordship of Christ? I spoke to them of Wesley’s contention that we can indeed become perfected in love and we began to address just what that means.

As with just about everyone I know, the three of us agreed that the people we have the most trouble loving perfectly are the ones closest to us. Sometimes I think that “punching one another’s buttons” should become an Olympic sport. We’ve all experienced it done exquisitely well–and we’ve all done it to others.

By then, we had started talking about Wesley’s accountability groups and the human challenges of being truly vulnerable with others. All share the same fear: “If you really know me, will you actually still love me?”

I began to speak of some of the most dark and painful times in my life, and how they had shaped me and taught me things I could never have learned firsthand any other way.

One stated, “Why is it that I cry nearly every time I’m in worship?” I knew this person’s history in a religious group that systematically demeaned people and reminded them of their unworthiness.  I responded, “I suspect you are just beginning to understand that you are a beloved child of God, that you are fully forgiven, and that grace cushions you now at every turn. Tears of gratefulness are a natural response to this.”

The other person began to speak of a friendship that had recently come along that permitted total honestly between the two of them and how that had freed them both to come closer to God.

At this point, I looked at my watch, startled to note that we were thirty minutes over the usual ending time. All of us could have continued the conversation for some time to come, but suddenly my weariness reasserted itself and we agreed it was time to close.

The Pattern of Discipleship

Later, I thought hard about the way I had just spent that hour and a half. Essentially, we were three beat up older people sharing stories, seeking the face of God in the midst of our daily challenges.

By church planting growth models and techniques, this was a poor use of my time and energy. Neither of them would ever distinguish themselves as magnets to pull people into this church community. They are not “movers and shakers” or “people of influence.” Neither has any money, so they are not going to help with financial issues. They are both quiet servants of God, willing to help where they are able, but not “take-charge” leaders nor charismatic visionaries who would invite others onto this bandwagon.

I’ve become aware that this is a pattern for me: a willingness to go deep with those who very much desire a well-integrated Christian walk. But despite the deep discipleship that is clearly taking place here, this type of methodology does not build big churches. It doesn’t attract crowds, my blogging about this brings only a few dedicated readers, and extended writings about this will hardly hit the best seller lists.

My Questions About Discipleship/Shepherding

All this has me asking questions about the role of United Methodist pastors (or of any denomination, I guess). As a pastor/teacher, clearly shepherding must be integral to my work. But if I am primarily shepherd, that role automatically slams a limit of the numbers that can be well reached by me.

The quick answer is always, “Well, you are not much of a shepherd if your groups are not multiplying. You should be creating other shepherds who will disciple their own flocks.” Yes . . . but I need to explore this analogy a bit: can a sheep ever turn into a shepherd? Can they shapeshift that way? Or could it be that shepherds are especially formed and gifted for this role?

If I understand correctly, shepherds, in the times and culture in which Jesus taught, had extraordinarily lonely and often dangerous jobs. They had to both protect their flock against multiple dangers and possible attacks, AND they had to make sure that proper nurturing took place so their flocks would have adequate food and water and and could reproduce healthily.

Shepherds had to be pretty self-sufficient and extremely watchful and wary. Surely that constant watchfulness, coupled with their loneliness, took an emotional toll of them. I wonder if they burned out, as do so many modern day “shepherds,” i.e., pastors.

Now, as to the reproduction: at first glance, it looks like I’ve just lost my argument here. But, here’s the catch. When a flock did reproduce rapidly, part of those sheep had to shifted to other shepherds because there is an upper limit of sheep that one shepherd can effectively watch over.

Size and the Itinerant Life

We live in a world where size rules. If it is bigger then it has to be better. We certainly think that about our churches. But is it? Can we really do intense discipleship with large crowds? We can certain have great programs and create lots of energy and come up with full offering plates and fabulous plans for expansion but can we shape disciples, those who will follow Jesus all the way to the cross?

I ask these questions in light of the renewed talk about itinerancy that permeates much clergy conversation. We United Methodist Clergy, following John Wesley’s pattern, “itinerate” from place to place, going where the Bishop sends us, hopefully being the right pastor for the church to which we are sent.

It is my understanding that one of the reasons Wesley used this model is that he felt strongly that most preachers really only had a very few excellent sermons in them. By keeping them moving, he could ensure powerful, well-planned preaching with different voices being heard in the local congregational, and the localized pastors did the hands-on work of discipleship.

Current Realities

I, however, am expected to deliver an excellent message weekly, to the same congregation so messages must be prepared freshly each week and can’t be repeated, AND do all that the localized pastor did.  That is, I must  ensure that people are discipled with its intense person-to-person contact, that mission takes place, and that temporal affairs are properly administered, as well as marry, bury and baptize. AND I’d better show good numbers in both people and monetary growth (not necessarily growth in spiritual maturity) or risk being called “ineffective.”

It this possible?

I face my failures daily in multiple areas. It is because I am not suited for this work? Or could it be that we’ve got some of this wrong?

If you have read this far, I’d surely appreciate any thoughts you have on these subjects.

9 Comments

Filed under accountability, clergy, Confirmation, discipleship, itinerancy, questions

Short Cuts, Herbicides, Church Growth Techniques and a Swath of Death

Flower Bed and Weeds

As I continue my work of finding multiple parallels between church and garden, I find myself frequently returning to the issue of short cuts.

The current picture:  my long-suffering husband has built for me a massive number of flower and vegetable beds at the parsonage where we live as he is aware that my soul stays cleaner and healthier when my hands stay dirty and soil-stained.

The two of us have a general division of duties for yard and garden:  he does the vast majority of the big heavy work—building the beds, hauling in the dirt, tilling as necessary, coming up with innovative and affordable watering systems, mowing and edging.  I purchase plants and seeds, put them in the ground, and lovingly tend them, and that includes hand weeding this large number of planting areas.

Now, I was gone for nine weeks, had major surgery two weeks before that, and was in the midst of Lent and Easter before that.  The result of months of neglect in the fast growing and very wet spring months?  The weeds have made major, huge, significant, destructive and discouraging moves into those formerly weed free beds.

Oh my.  Goodness gracious.  Yikes.  What a mess.

The Short Cut Solution

After about 50 hours of hard labor in the last ten, hot, dry, days, I am beginning to see the return of those flower and vegetable beds to their former status, but some of the extremely invasive weeds are going to take months of diligence for me to eliminate them.

I really would love a quick solution.

But here’s why I don’t use one.  This article speaks of the destruction of probably hundreds of thousands of trees by use of an herbicide (weed killer).

This herbicide, developed and marketed by DuPont, was described this way:

Imprelis, which was registered by the EPA in October and marketed to professionals treating residential and commercial lawns, golf courses and sod farms, was touted by DuPont as “an innovation that was worth the wait.”

“It is the most scientifically advanced turf herbicide in over 40 years,” the company said in a marketing release, citing more than 400 field trial protocols dating to 2006.

Professional lawn care specialists apparently embraced it with enthusiasm.  After all, who doesn’t like a short cut that makes life so much easier and would increase profits?

It also proved to be particularly deadly to evergreens such as Norway spruce and white pine trees.  Probably hundreds of thousands of trees have died.

Yes, lawsuits have been filed.

The short cut, marketed as most short cuts are as a way to make life easier and more pleasant and to eliminate tedious chores, left this large swath of death.  Of course, the lawns and golf courses are also probably weed free, but at what cost?  A mature tree is valued at thousands of dollars, and simply can’t be replaced at that same maturity.  It will take years to recover from this “short cut.”

Two Common Church Short Cuts

So what are two major short cuts we tend to leap upon in the life of the church?

First, the decision that “making disciples” is a short term activity and can be achieved by pushing people through a series of classes and thinking we’ll graduate spiritually rich, mature individuals.  It takes years and a lot of life experience along with the careful practice of spiritual disciplines to move into deep maturity.  That doesn’t mean that young, not yet fully formed (for no one is fully formed) people should not take leadership roles in church life.  It does mean awareness that they’ve got a lot of growing to do, and even several years in intensive study, such as in a seminary environment, does not necessary equate to one walking in tune with God and well equipped with holy discernment.

Second, the wholesale and undiscerning implementation of ministry techniques, generally taught at expensive and highly touted seminars where “successful” church leaders share their secrets to explosive growth.  Those techniques will often do what the short cut of artificial fertilizers will do:  cause some very impressive short term growth.  However, with out the in-depth improvement of the soil, the plants will demand heavier and heavier applications of artificial fertilizers—all of which will eventually kill the soil.  Healthy soil, the kind that supports long term and sustained growth, takes a lot of time to create.  Plant growth in healthy soil is often slower than those grown with artificial stimulants, but is much, much healthier and able to survive predators far better.

The Grasshoppers Cometh

While I was gone, we here in North Texas experienced the annual invasion of grasshoppers.  That happens yearly, but some years are far worse, and this was a particularly bad one.  I had read about the invasion before I returned home as several gardeners mentioned that their vegetables had been stripped by those voracious little critters.  I expected to find almost everything gone when I arrived home.

Much to my surprise, except for one hibiscus that has always had a problem with grasshoppers (probably not enough sun), and two tomato plants, already well past their prime, nothing else seemed harmed.  The critters were present in the garden, but not in huge numbers.  I believe the essential health of those plants, growing in carefully cultivated soil, slowly built up over several years by frequent application of organic mulch and gentle, natural fertilization, gave them an edge over the artificially stimulated plants found in most gardens.  They were alive–and they were also competing with all those weeds for moisture and nutrients.

I honestly wish there were herbicides that I could spray indiscriminately and magically erase my weed problems without causing other damage.  But such a product will never exist.  I also wish I could wave my magic wand, create the ideal discipleship program and systematically turn out mature Christians whose passion in life is to love God, love their neighbors, and fill the church seats and coffers.  But at what cost?

Boredom or Diversity?

But even as I write such a goal, it sounds stultifying and boring to me.  Who wants a mass-produced Christian when it is our very diversity that provides color, life and the possibility of touching the entire world with grace, not just those who look like me?  A garden with only one plant might turn out a lot of food or offer a bundle of cut flowers for a season, but it will eventually destroy the soil.  But a garden bounteous with diverse plants, various ripening/blooming times, and contrasting textures, heights and colors brings delight and life to the world.  I think that is what we are supposed to be about.

3 Comments

Filed under church as garden, discipleship, education, food, garden, nutrients, short cuts, soil