Gendercide, Theology and the Female Voice

An excellent editorial in the Dallas Morning News reminds us of the enormous amount of hidden “gendercide” that has taken place over the last generation.  “Gendercide” is the selective abortion or infanticide of female fetuses and infants, particularly in China and India, but also in the Middle East, Africa and Eastern Europe.

Beverly Hill, the article author, states flatly:

Contrary to popular belief, the status of women does not improve when females are in short supply. In fact, just the opposite occurs. Sex trafficking increases, as does the buying and selling of brides. Aging bachelors, unable to find women of appropriate age, marry ever younger girls. These child brides leave school and begin bearing children. Maternal death rates soar as girls in their early teens attempt tasks their bodies cannot manage.

Evidence reveals strong correlations between sex imbalance and crime. A study conducted in 2000 showed that sex ratios are the best predictors of murder rates in India — better predictors than poverty, illiteracy or urbanization. In China, crime has spiked in the regions where sex-selective technology first became available.

Women, devalued in about every society and in about every religion, must be present and influential in every society and every religion in order to bring stability and health.  Who would have known?  Wow!

And yet, even in the supposedly enlightened West where we say all are valued, many religious leaders (mostly male) insist that their Bible, rightly read (i.e., the way they read it) insists that women must not take pastoral leadership roles in the church.  Women’s voices are limited to what is now called their “spheres of influence,” i.e., other women and children, but not in the public square where theology is debated and honed and where much religious thought finds press and influence.

Long ago, I left that theological world, but I spent many, many years there.  I continue to read what they write, and wonder that they can’t see the subtle effect of keeping women silent in positions of influence.  In much of the world, the silence is not even subtle.  It’s overt, violent, and is going to even further destabilize already unstable societies.

It will take at least one more generation to begin to change this balance, IF people will do what is necessary:  speak out loudly about this world-wide tragedy and do whatever possible to turn this around.

What if we don’t act?  I shudder to think of the consequences of unstable, increasingly violent societies whose technology gives power to destroy all of us.

After I wrote this post on January 15, I saw this article in the January 16 New York Times.  It speaks of life in a North Dakota town where again, men hugely outnumber women and how the few women there are routinely harassed and are the targets of dangerous, unwanted attention.

One would like to think that at some point, we have learned that all human beings, both before and after birth, are deserving of respect.  What a fantasy.  And again, unfortunately, religious thought often makes it worse.  I’m right in the middle of reading a book about life for women in Saudi Arabia called In the Land of Invisible Women, written by Qanta Ahmed who is a Muslim physician but had never been to Saudi Arabia until she spend some time there in medical practice and discovered what it was like to be veiled and covered at all times when away from her living quarters  or in another private residence.  It’s both fascinating and sad.

Always, I ask:  why must some people be kept as less than human in order for others to see themselves as fully human.

Many years ago, Dorothy Sayers, theologian, novelist, profoundly Christian woman, wrote a book called, “Are Women Human?”  That short book still needs to be widely read.  She wrote it asking why it is that woman in so many ways, especially in theological worlds, are described as human and in the image of God yet often with the word “but” added.  “But” they can’t do this or shouldn’t do that.

There are lots of societal issues that the church must address.  The United Methodist Church has a great track record of addressing many of these knotty and societal and theologically complex issues.  I think we must remember that the battle is not yet over here.

3 thoughts on “Gendercide, Theology and the Female Voice

  1. You raise an important issue. The same “selective abortion” happens to children with Down syndrome in America (and other nations) today. The excellent memoir “Expecting Adam” Martha Beck tells the story of a successful Ivy League academician who was “strongly urged” to have an abortion when she found out her child had Down. So much for “a woman’s choice.”

    Thank you for the post.


  2. We can’t turn a blind eye to our own sins. Every single day 3,200 babies are murdered in cold blood under the lie of “reproductive rights”


    1. Donnie, you are right. There is also evidence of sex selective abortion in the U.S., particularly with second and later pregnancies among immigrants from Asia and the mid-East. There are various solutions. Probably the most effective has been the South Korean approach of educating women, anti-discrimination suits and equal-rights rulings that made son preference seem old-fashioned and unnecessary. Economic development and general education alone do not help because, within China and India the areas with the worst sex ratios are the richest, best-educated ones. See and for more information.
      I believe that our current acceptance of abortion as birth control and for convenience is morally wrong. I am amazed that the abortion of thousands of innocent children each day causes so much less national trauma that the horrible shooting of 20 innocent children at Sandy Hook Elementary School on one day. As Mother Teresa said, “The so-called right to abortion has pitted mothers against their children and women against men. It has sown violence and discord at the heart of the most intimate human relationships. It has aggravated the derogation of the father’s role in an increasingly fatherless society. It has portrayed the greatest of gifts — a child — as a competitor, an intrusion, and an inconvenience. It has nominally accorded mothers unfettered dominion over the independent lives of their physically dependent sons and daughters. And, in granting this unconscionable power, it has exposed many women to unjust and selfish demands from their husbands or other sexual partners. Human rights are not a privilege conferred by government. They are every human being’s entitlement by virtue of his humanity. The right to life does not depend, and must not be declared to be contingent, on the pleasure of anyone else, not even a parent or a sovereign.” It seems to me that, if we wish to look for the roots of our “culture of violence,” we need look no further than the unfettered “right” of abortion and its consequences. For example, compare violence in schools before and after Roe v. Wade.


What do you think? I'd love to hear from you! Abusive comments may be removed at the discretion of the blog moderator.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s