The Fox in the Henhouse

Is it gracious to let a fox loose in a henhouse?

I believe most of us would say a hearty “no” to that, but think about it a moment.

Assuming for just a moment that foxes can talk, suppose a fox comes to you, the henhouse owner, and says,

I know I’ve had  some problems in the past, and may have possibly caused harm to a few of  your plump little hens. However, all that took place when I was a young fox, still quite immature emotionally, with undeveloped  techniques for dealing with my temptations and perhaps just a few boundary issues.

However, I have reformed.  I want you to know that you were right when you expelled me from your area, and made me live for a while  where I had no access to hens.  Now I am mature and know my boundaries. I am sure I will never hurt your hens again.

 Your henhouse was my favorite place.  It is comfortable and I am happy there.  Remember, I am a living creature, just as those hens are, and I also deserve to have a place to live that is comfortable.

 I am asking you to let me back into the henhouse. After all, you say you are a believer in grace and in giving second (and many more) chances to those who make mistakes.  Since you want grace yourself, it seems to me that you should also give me grace and open that door for me.  After all, doesn’t that Bible of yours say that you need to forgive and to be reconciled to the person who did wrong? I have apologized, after all.

Now, what would you do?


The fox has made a decent theological argument.  We are supposed to forgive, so the henhouse owner needs to forgive the fox for having eaten a number of his hens and terrorized the rest of them.

Maybe the fox really has reformed!  Wouldn’t that be amazing–to show the world that a fox can live with hens and not hurt them?  It would be a miracle–who could resist that?

So, would you open the door of the henhouse to the fox?

Of course not.  A fox is still a fox.

Nonetheless, a church in Dallas has essentially done just that.  They’ve opened the doors, placed a person in pastoral leadership with a known history of sexually predatory behavior toward young teen girls, and said, “Hey, this is in the name of grace!  After all, he’s learned his lesson.  He says he’s got a firm handle on his boundaries now.  It’s a miracle!”

I ask, “Just how gracious is it to the vulnerable teens in that church to intentionally place a known sexual predator in a position of trust?”

I read about this church’s decision the day after I spent hours in a seminar to learn how to identify sexually predatory behavior.  Most sexual abusers live and work in positions of trust.  They are likeable, believable, charming, and enjoyable to be around.  They carefully groom the gatekeepers, those who have the responsibility of protecting children and youth, and gain amazingly free access to their victims.  Few are caught and prosecuted.  Most abuse hundreds of victims over their lifetimes.

I am all for healing, for growth to greater maturity, for miracles.  I want to breathe the world of grace, and am utterly grateful for the grace of God and the grace of my friends, family, colleagues and church members that is showered on me.  To give that back is my greatest privilege.

But grace does not mean that we intentionally leave unprotected the most vulnerable of our societies.  Keeping the fox out of the henhouse may not seem gracious to the fox, but it surely is gracious to the hens. Let’s be wise, folks. Not condemning, but wise. We can do this.

3 thoughts on “The Fox in the Henhouse

  1. Ok, I’m 100% with you on this one. Grace to the fox does not mean that he gets to reside in the hen house. I’d go so far as to say that by putting him a position where he might be tempted that instead of grace being offered that I’d in a sense be doing him harm. You can compare this to Paul telling his readers about not eating meat sacrificed to idols because it could cause your brother or sister to sin. So putting a former sex offender in a position of trust for young people is not grace at all. We must be careful that we don’t become stumbling blocks in our desire to offer grace.


  2. This is a thinker.

    Grace means restoration to the light and love of the Holy One and the holy community. But one *can* receive grace while having a new and different identity.

    I’ll use the example the reverend used. Can we forgive a leader who violated a vulnerable soul or souls? Yes. Can we reconcile with someone who has exploited our trust? Yes. But does reconciliation mean that the penitent person resumes his or her identity — the same identity that cloaked a dangerous appetite? Reconciliation means we go forward together with a new covenant and new expectations.

    Doesn’t it?

    A fox will be a fox whether it creeps near the henhouse or if it hunts far, far away.

    Won’t it?

    Cindy Breeding


  3. I agree with you 100%. Just don’t understand what this church must be
    thinking. I understand Grace, I think, but I really believe this is pushing
    envelope. Betty Ross (


What do you think? I'd love to hear from you! Abusive comments may be removed at the discretion of the blog moderator.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s